Pearls and pitfalls for comminuted distal radius fractures

Fractures of the distal end of radius have been estimated to account for nearly 20% of all fractures seen in a routine emergency room. Despite this, until very recently, the distal radius fracture was not treated as aggressively as other less common peri-articular fractures. Perhaps Abraham Colles’ perception that this fracture had good outcomes, no matter what was done had permeated our thinking. The reality is that frequent poor outcomes in wrist injury fuelled a gradual, albeit delayed, pursuit of a better treatment option.

Distal radius fractures are usually sustained by elderly osteoporotic patients after a fall or by younger patients as a result of high energy trauma. Both of these fractures deserve stable internal fixation, the former due to osteoporotic bone that demands sound fixation principles and the latter requires the ability to reduce intra-articular comminuted fragments in a stable manner that maintains the reduction and permits early mobilization. Until the advent of volar fixed angle plating, no technique could satisfy these requirements in a consistent manner.

Since the first description of Colles fracture in 1814, the treatment options for distal radius fractures have varied from relative neglect to active management by open reduction and internal fixation with combined approaches. In the past decade, distal radial fixation has benefited from the limelight as different groups of inves-tigators have been developing new implants and techniques to improve the outcome of the fractures.

 Nevertheless, unstable fractures of the distal radius still remain challenging problems for orthopedic surgeons with hand surgeons taking the lead to alter the basic premise of how these should be managed. The consensus prevails that the majority of displaced distal radial fractures are articular injuries resulting in the disruption of both the radiocarpal and the distal radioulnar joint, hence, demanding more precise reduction.

fractures are articular injuries resulting in the disruption of both the radiocarpal and the distal radioulnar joint, hence, demanding more precise reduction.

The importance of achieving and maintaining both an anatomic reduction of the articular surface and the extraarticular alignment of the distal radius has been documented by several clinical and biomechanical studies.